Using Cases, Evidences and Context to Support Decision Making
نویسندگان
چکیده
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) represents a decision-making process centered on justifications of relevant information contained scientific research proof found in the Internet. Context is a type of knowledge that supports identifying what is or is not relevant in a given situation. Therefore, the integration of evidence and context is still an open issue. Besides, EBP procedures do not provide mechanisms to retain strategic knowledge from individual solutions, which could facilitate the learning of decision makers, preserving evidences used. On the other hand, Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) uses the history of similar cases and provides mechanisms to retain problem-solving. This paper proposes the integration of the CBR model with EBP procedures and Context to support decision making. Our approach includes a conceptual framework extended to support the development of applications that combines cases, evidence and context, preserving the characteristics of usability and portability across domains. An implementation in the area of crime prevention illustrates the usage of our proposal.
منابع مشابه
Product Development Decision Support System Customer-Based
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been traditionally used as a planning tool primarily for product development and quality improvement. In this context, many people have used QFD for making decisions on how to prioritize critical product areas from a customer perspective. However, it is the position of the author that the QFD process can be viewed as a decision support system that would enc...
متن کاملThe place of AHP method among Multi Criteria Decision Making methods in forest management
As the name implies, Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) is a decision making tool that capable the selection of the most preferred choice in a context where several criteria apply simultaneously. Primary purpose of this study is to examine the status of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) in forest management. The study also aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses ...
متن کاملRelationship of Ethical Leadership Context with Affective Commitment: Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support
Background: Ethical leadership represents the leader's proactive efforts to influence followers' ethical and unethical behavior and Follower work attitudes such as perceived organizational support, affective commitment and normal behaviors. The purpose of this research was to test the relationship of ethical leadership and ethical context with affective commitment that mediating the role of per...
متن کاملMoving Towards Accountability for Reasonableness – A Systematic Exploration of the Features of Legitimate Healthcare Coverage Decision-Making Processes Using Rare Diseases and Regenerative Therapies as a Case Study
Background The accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework defines 4 conditions for legitimate healthcare coverage decision processes: Relevance, Publicity, Appeals, and Enforcement. The aim of this study was to reflect on how the diverse features of decision-making processes can be aligned with A4R conditions to guide decisio...
متن کاملگزارش یک مورد سندروم نورولپتیک بدخیم ناشی از مصرف ریسپریدون درافراد با ریسک پذیری پایین
Background & objective: Factors such as improved medical technology, resource allocation, increasing costs, the rights of individuals and the changing roles of nurses can result in ethical conflicts that demand the ability of nurses to recognize moral dilemmas and conflicts and to make appropriate ethical decisions. The aim of this article is to explain the concept of patient or nurse harm in t...
متن کامل